NASLite Network Attached Storage

I'm debating on buying a copy of NASLite or buying a NAS device like Linksys's NSLU. I'm mainly using the storage for MP3's, shared files, etc.

Can anyone tell me why the pros/cons of both?

I have and use both NASlite+ v1.5/v2 and the Linksys NSLU2 with firmware v23RA5. I've "overclocked" the NSLU2 (a must) to fully use it's 266 mhz CPU. Side-by-side they both provide a capable NAS function. The NSLU2 permits 2 attached USB disks formatted to .ext3 (despite what anyone might tell you). Generally it provides steady NAS functions (HTTP/FTP), but it is not "quick" ... even overclocked, file transfers, and video streaming are "challenged" ... you can stream DivX/Xvid but that's it. On the other and NASLite+, and particularly v2 is a robust, expandable, reliable, server foundation - that uses old or new PC equipment, and gigabit connectivity (if you choose). You can now even use attached external USB and Firewire drives. I'm coming up on a year of rock solid performance, and no regrets.
So: both work fine, and I have a place on my network for both. But when I stream video and backup my one-of-a-kind photos, music, and important documents, it's NASLite only. I rely on NASLite quality - period.

I have been using my two NAS Lite servers for well over a year and could not be happier. Version 2 promises to replace my v 1.5 servers shortly.

All that said, I sold my NSLU2 a few weeks ago. For less money than you would spend on the NSLU2, you can purchase an older PC that is more capable and more expandable.

IMHO, it is a no brainer !

I'm still running NASLite 1.0 and have had zero problems with it. I even have changed machines and upgraded to a Gigabit NIC with no problems. I will be upgrading to 2.0 as soon as the F-in banks get around to moving my money. It is a cheap reliable solution.

Mike