I was also given the opportunity to try the new kernel (thanks alot btw!) and here is my numbers:
Quote:
C:\Documents and Settings\henke\Desktop>E:\dw\diskWriggler-1.0.1.win32\diskwriggler -NTSC -C -t -n 4000 -o \\192.168.0.11\disk-0
Frame Resolution : 720 x 486
Bytes / Pixel : 2,00 (packed) (8 bit, 4:2:2 sampling)
Frame Size : 699,840 bytes
File Type : All frames in one container file (2,799,360,000 bytes).
Writing 4000 x 699840 byte frames into file \\192.168.0.11\disk-0/framestream.dat
537 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 107,40 FPS (71,68 MB/s)
478 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 95,60 FPS (63,81 MB/s)
554 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 110,80 FPS (73,95 MB/s)
489 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 97,80 FPS (65,27 MB/s)
141 frames in 5,23 secs ==> 26,94 FPS (17,98 MB/s)
158 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 31,60 FPS (21,09 MB/s)
158 frames in 5,66 secs ==> 27,93 FPS (18,64 MB/s)
189 frames in 5,61 secs ==> 33,69 FPS (22,49 MB/s)
273 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 54,60 FPS (36,44 MB/s)
276 frames in 5,02 secs ==> 55,03 FPS (36,73 MB/s)
246 frames in 5,39 secs ==> 45,63 FPS (30,46 MB/s)
255 frames in 5,48 secs ==> 46,50 FPS (31,03 MB/s)
246 frames in 3,70 secs ==> 66,43 FPS (44,34 MB/s)
Write Summary : 4000.00 frames in 66,09 secs
: 26,94(min) 60,52(avg) 110,80(max) FPS
: 17,98(min) 40,39(avg) 73,95(max) MB/s
Reading 4000 x 699840 byte frames from file \\192.168.0.11\disk-0/framestream.dat
12 frames in 5,09 secs ==> 2,36 FPS (1,57 MB/s)
18 frames in 5,11 secs ==> 3,52 FPS (2,35 MB/s)
54 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 10,80 FPS (7,21 MB/s)
155 frames in 5,02 secs ==> 30,90 FPS (20,63 MB/s)
214 frames in 5,02 secs ==> 42,67 FPS (28,48 MB/s)
215 frames in 5,02 secs ==> 42,87 FPS (28,61 MB/s)
204 frames in 5,02 secs ==> 40,67 FPS (27,15 MB/s)
181 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 36,20 FPS (24,16 MB/s)
199 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 39,80 FPS (26,56 MB/s)
210 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 42,00 FPS (28,03 MB/s)
210 frames in 5,02 secs ==> 41,87 FPS (27,94 MB/s)
211 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 42,20 FPS (28,17 MB/s)
211 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 42,20 FPS (28,17 MB/s)
209 frames in 5,02 secs ==> 41,67 FPS (27,81 MB/s)
195 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 39,00 FPS (26,03 MB/s)
184 frames in 5,02 secs ==> 36,69 FPS (24,48 MB/s)
191 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 38,20 FPS (25,50 MB/s)
184 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 36,80 FPS (24,56 MB/s)
198 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 39,60 FPS (26,43 MB/s)
208 frames in 5,02 secs ==> 41,47 FPS (27,68 MB/s)
207 frames in 5,02 secs ==> 41,27 FPS (27,55 MB/s)
184 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 36,80 FPS (24,56 MB/s)
146 frames in 3,52 secs ==> 41,53 FPS (27,72 MB/s)
Read Summary : 4000.00 frames in 113,88 secs
: 2,36(min) 35,13(avg) 42,87(max) FPS
: 1,57(min) 23,44(avg) 28,61(max) MB/s
Reads are now actually lower than with the previous kernel
Any ideas as to what is causing these low numbers, I'm all ears!
Update: If i set the number of frames back to 2000 (the parameter for diskwriggler) I get the following:
Quote:
E:\dw\diskWriggler-1.0.1.win32\diskwriggler -NTSC -C -t -n 2000 -o \\192.168.0.11\disk-0
Frame Resolution : 720 x 486
Bytes / Pixel : 2,00 (packed) (8 bit, 4:2:2 sampling)
Frame Size : 699,840 bytes
File Type : All frames in one container file (1,399,680,000 bytes).
Writing 2000 x 699840 byte frames into file \\192.168.0.11\disk-0/framestream.dat
576 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 115,20 FPS (76,89 MB/s)
535 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 107,00 FPS (71,41 MB/s)
615 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 123,00 FPS (82,09 MB/s)
274 frames in 2,44 secs ==> 112,41 FPS (75,02 MB/s)
Write Summary : 2000.00 frames in 17,44 secs
: 107,00(min) 114,70(avg) 123,00(max) FPS
: 71,41(min) 76,55(avg) 82,09(max) MB/s
Reading 2000 x 699840 byte frames from file \\192.168.0.11\disk-0/framestream.dat
412 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 82,40 FPS (55,00 MB/s)
435 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 87,00 FPS (58,07 MB/s)
491 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 98,20 FPS (65,54 MB/s)
494 frames in 5,00 secs ==> 98,80 FPS (65,94 MB/s)
168 frames in 1,77 secs ==> 95,15 FPS (63,51 MB/s)
Read Summary : 2000.00 frames in 21,77 secs
: 82,40(min) 91,89(avg) 98,80(max) FPS
: 55,00(min) 61,33(avg) 65,94(max) MB/s
Does that make sense? Is this a RAM size issue? If I transfer an 800MB file through FTP the actual numbers are wayyy lower (30MB/s reads & writes). If i I do a simple file copy in windows explorer the reads are 30MB/s and writes are 20MB/s. How does DW numbers compare to FTP & SMB numbers?
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
I have the very same motherboard and would love to see if this kernel resolves the problems I'm having.
