NASLite Network Attached Storage

www.serverelements.com
Task-specific simplicity with low hardware requirements.
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 6:39 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:56 pm
Posts: 82
Tony, Ralph,

I use NASLite-2 as the primary storage for all of my SageTV recordings. While debugging a problem (unrelated to NL2) Sage support told me that my NAS was taking a very long time to delete recordings. (Between 3 and 10 seconds depending on the size of the recordings which range from 1.5 GB to 12 GB.)

I do notice it takes a long time to delete recordings but I've always assumed it was something SageTV was doing.

Is it normal for NL2 to take so long to delete a large file? Is there anything that can be done to make the operation go quicker?

Thanks,

Tom


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Slow delete
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:43 pm
Posts: 2
I'm waiting on naslite hdd version so I don't know too much about the product yet, but if you can use xfs file system in naslite you may want to try that. XFS is able to delele large files very quickly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 5:09 am
Posts: 130
This is most probably due to the EXT3 journaling. From what I know, it is slower to delete files in general compared to say EXT2.

I have the same experience when deleting large files from my NASlite server. The larger the file, the longer it takes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 4:29 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 4:11 pm
Posts: 1771
Location: Server Elements
ALucas is correct. Ext2 will in theory be faster, but the filesystem will loose the benefit of a journal. Ext3 on the other hand does carry an overhead introduced by the filesystem journal. The time it takes to complete the task is also very relative to the hardware used. Amount of RAM, bus speed, drive types, physical file location and number of associated segments, etc., all influence the actual time it takes to delete a file and update the journal. With smaller files, much of the task is performed in cache but with larger files that can't be the case.

Hope that helps... :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:56 pm
Posts: 82
Thanks for the replies and explanations. This is not a show stopper for me, just an annoyance. In the long run I'll put up with the slow deletes for the EXT3 benefits.

PS. I've been running 2.05 and it is rock solid.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group