romorio wrote:
on your site a lot of people complains about the problems with 4gb files using smb.
I understand the 1782 size if your floppy format. If you don't find a solution on a short term your prodoct will be dead, because at this moment, new routers containts or other samba serverscan be bought
for pinuts.
If you want to go on with your product find a solution, or your product will be dead in a few month .
For me it is now dead , because my router is now suportedd a webserver, ftp server and samba server in one product, which works fine
See now I found it much easier to ask Tony or Ralph about a problem or idea I had that I felt would make NASlite a better product rather than be-little their product, and and every time I got a response quickly and openly from the Server Elements team, sometimes it was a yes good idea it'll be in the next release
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
and sometimes I got a nope never gonna happen
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
but you will always get an answer, to post a thread stating a product with an ongoing improvement model is "dead" is out of order
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
if you check the forums as edenq said the 4gb limit with SMB is being addressed, and as so many people have asked politley about it Tony and Ralph have decided to fast track the solution forward into another release for vers 1.* If you don't like NASlite go buy something else if you have some critiscm or want a special feature then ask the question reasonably for what you want and see what the response is.
Tony this sort of thread might be avoided if there was a bit of a forward schedule for what improvements are planned for when
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
And hey man we're not going to hold you to it
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
just a thought
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)